Myles M. Mattenson
ATTORNEY AT LAW 5550 Topanga Canyon Blvd. Suite 200 Woodland Hills, California 91367 Telephone (818) 313-9060 Facsimile (818) 313-9260 Email: MMM@MattensonLaw.com Web: http://www.MattensonLaw.com |
When I Sell My Coin Laundry And Assign My Lease To The Buyer, What Is My Future Lease Liability? |
|
|
When I Sell My Coin Laundry And Assign My Lease To The Buyer, Coin laundry operators generally lease rather than own the premises where their businesses are situated. When the day comes that a coin laundry operator decides to sell his business, a transfer or assignment of the lease to the buyer will be necessary. Written leases customarily require the written consent of the lessor to an assignment of the lease and leases generally provide that such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. In most instances, consent is provided, the buyer takes over the premises, timely pays the rent, and completes payment of the purchase price to the seller. The lessor is happy because rent is timely received, the buyer is happy because the location produces adequate income, and the seller is happy because the purchase price is timely and fully paid. Sometimes it doesn't work out that way! Perhaps you will be the seller whose run of luck has expired. Let us assume you wish to sell your business. You review your lease and find only three weeks remain to the end of your lease term. Astute fellow that you are, you quickly negotiate a new lease with the lessor providing for an additional five years, with two five-year options. You find a buyer, sell your coin laundry business and assign the lease, and proceed to enjoy life by travelling around the state of California attending various Dixieland Jazz Festivals. As is customary, the assignment of the lease does not release you from liability in the event your buyer fails to pay the rent. Six years later and one year into the first five-year option exercised by the buyer, the lessor, whose name you barely remember, drops you a note indicating that rent of $2,000.00 per month hasn't been paid for the past nine months and requests the appearance of your check on his desk for $18,000.00 in past due rent. You scratch your head, and wonder if you have any obligation to pay this past due amount. You call the lessor and explain to him that the option was for the buyer's benefit and not your own, that the buyer exercised the option and you did not, that the buyer is operating the coin laundry and you do not, and that the limit of your liability extends only through the initial five-year term of the lease. The lessor laughs, and says that since you are the one who signed the lease containing the five-year options, thereby binding the lessor to provide the lease extensions, you are bound to pay the rent for any such extension imposed upon him by the buyer if he fails to pay the rent. Who is right? An old California case, decided in 1920, tells us that the lessor is correct. Your next call to the lessor will thus be respectful, ingratiating, and probably on bended knee. What if your lease negotiations with the lessor were slightly different? What if the lessor had refused to provide any options and would only provide you with a five-year lease? Assume you were nonetheless able to sell your coin laundry business and assign such a lease to the buyer. Assume the buyer held over for an additional year after the expiration of the five-year term, and the lessor took no action to remove the buyer from the coin laundry under the theory that you remain liable anyway for any such holdover period. Assume the lessor makes the same telephone call, requesting nine months' past due rent, asserting that the buyer would not be in a position to retain possession had you not assigned the lease to him. You respond that you should not be held liable for the holdover period since the act of holding over was not undertaken by you, but rather, by the buyer. Who is right? This time, you win! A 1978 case in Los Angeles County advises that it is improper to impose liability on the seller under such circumstances for rent due for a period beyond the original lease, since the buyer did not have the right to remain after the expiration of the lease term. The moral of the story? There are long-range consequences to lease negotiations and many traps for the unwary! In the old west, settlers employed guides to traverse the wilderness. These days, attorneys can help you traverse the wilderness of fine print! [This column is intended to provide general information only and is not intended to provide specific legal advice; if you have a specific question regarding the law, you should contact an attorney of your choice. Suggestions for topics to be discussed in this column are welcome.] Reprinted from New Era Magazine Myles M. Mattenson © 1999-2002 |